The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Western Agri Seeds Ltd
High Court
27 Jan 2020 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Western Agri Seeds Ltd
Date of order
27 Jan 2020
Assessment year(s)
2013-14, 2010-11
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Western Agri Seeds Ltd, the High Court (2020) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 4.In view of the order passed in Tax Appeal No.834 of 2019, the Tax Appeal also fails and is hereby dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
C/TAXAP/784/2019 ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABADR/TAX APPEAL NO. 784 of 2019
==========================================================
THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VersusWESTERN AGRI SEEDS LTD.
==========================================================
Appearance:
MRS MAUNA M BHATT(174) for the Appellant(s) No. 1 for the Opponent(s) No. 1==========================================================CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA
andHONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BHARGAV D. KARIA
Date : 27/01/2020
ORAL ORDER
(PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA)
1.This Tax Appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short, 'the act, 1961') is at the instance of the Revenue and is directed against the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Ahmedabad 'B' Bench, dated 27[th] June 2019 in the ITA No. 2237/Ahd/2017 for the A.Y. 2013-14.
2.The Revenue has proposed following two questions of law for the consideration of this Court :
“[A] Whether the Appellate Tribunal is correct, considering the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, in upholding the order of the CIT(A) for deleting disallowance on account of discountandratedifferenceto Rs.3,67,98,650/-?
[B]Whether the Appellate Tribunal is correct, considering the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, in upholding the order of the CIT(A) for deleting disallowances made u/s 40(A)(2)(b) to Rs.1,65,38,800/-?”
3.We take notice of the fact that in the case of very same assessee for the A.Y. 2010-11, the very same questions of law were proposed in Tax Appeal No. 834 of 2019. This Court declined to admit the Tax Appeal No.834 of 2019 on such proposed questions of law by the Revenue.
4.In view of the order passed in Tax Appeal No.834 of 2019, the Tax Appeal also fails and is hereby dismissed.
(J. B. PARDIWALA, J)
KUMAR ALOK
(BHARGAV D. KARIA, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.