The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax(Central) Jaipur, Jaipur v. Shri Navrattan Kothari, B
High Court
13 May 2019 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax(Central) Jaipur, Jaipur v. Shri Navrattan Kothari, B
Date of order
13 May 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax(Central) Jaipur, Jaipur v. Shri Navrattan Kothari, B, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In view of above, present appeal is dismissed in the light ofaforesaid instruction.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Income Tax Appeal No.264/2018
The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax(Central) Jaipur, Jaipur
----Appellant
Versus
Shri Navrattan Kothari, B-1, B-2 Kothari House Prithviraj Road CScheme Jaipur
----Respondent
For Appellant(s) : Ms. ArchnaFor Respondent(s): Mr. Sanjay Jhanwar
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA
Order
13/05/2019
For stated reasons, the delay in filing the appeal is condoned. Theapplication under Section 5 of the Limitation Act stands disposed of.
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that in view of CircularNo. 3/2018 issued by Central Board of Direct Taxes, present appealhaving tax effect of only Rs. 27,61,577/- which is less than Rs.50,00,000/- may not be maintainable.
In view of above, present appeal is dismissed in the light ofaforesaid instruction.
However, the appellant will be at liberty to apply for revival of theappeal in case its case falls within the purview of any of the conditionstipulated in Clause 10 of the aforesaid circular.
(NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J
(MOHAMMAD RAFIQ),J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.