The Principal Commissioner Of Income Taxcorporate Circle-2(2)Chennai-34 v. M/S.hinduja Foundries Ltd.(Merged With M/S.ashok Leyland Ltd.)Kathivakkam High Road, Ennore Chennai 600 057Pan : Aaa Ce 1078K
High Court
25 Aug 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
The Principal Commissioner Of Income Taxcorporate Circle-2(2)Chennai-34 v. M/S.hinduja Foundries Ltd.(Merged With M/S.ashok Leyland Ltd.)Kathivakkam High Road, Ennore Chennai 600 057Pan : Aaa Ce 1078K
Date of order
25 Aug 2022
Assessment year(s)
2011-12
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In The Principal Commissioner Of Income Taxcorporate Circle-2(2)Chennai-34 v. M/S.hinduja Foundries Ltd.(Merged With M/S.ashok Leyland Ltd.)Kathivakkam High Road, Ennore Chennai 600 057Pan : Aaa Ce 1078K, the High Court (2022) decided the matter under Section 36, Section 260A, Section 115JB of the Income-tax Act.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
T.C.A.No.343 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED 25.08.2022
CORAM
THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE R. MAHADEVAN
AND
THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ
Tax Case Appeal No.343 of 2021
The Principal Commissioner of Income TaxCorporate Circle-2(2)Chennai-34
.. Appellant
Vs.
M/s.Hinduja Foundries Ltd.(Merged with M/s.Ashok Leyland Ltd.)Kathivakkam High Road, Ennore Chennai 600 057PAN : AAA CE 1078K
.. Respondent
Tax Case Appeal filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961
against the order dated 02.05.2018 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, 'C' Bench, Chennai, in I.T.A.No.2691/Mds/2017.
For Appellant : Mr.Karthik Ranganathan
Standing Counsel
J U D G M E N T
(Judgment was delivered by R. MAHADEVAN, J.)
This tax case appeal has been filed by the appellant/Revenue, calling in
question the correctness of the order dated 02.05.2018 passed by the Income
Tax Appellate Tribunal, 'C' Bench, Chennai, in I.T.A.No.2691/Mds/2017, relating to the assessment year 2011-12.
2. By order dated 06.07.2021, this Court admitted the aforesaid tax case
appeal on the following substantial questions of law :
“1. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case in law the ITAT was right in ignoring the Explanation 1(f) to Section 115JB(2) of the Act where such disallowances made are to be increased for the purpose of computing book profit?
2. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case in law the ITAT was correct and justified in holding that the belated remittance of employees contribution to PF & ESI as per relevant Act, but before the due date of filing of the IT return in accordance with IT Act, which is in contravention of provisions of Section 36(1)(va) of the Act?”
3. When the matter was taken up for consideration, the learned Standing
Counsel for the appellant/Revenue brought to the notice of this court the
Circular No.17/2019 dated 08.08.2019, issued by the Central Board Direct
T.C.A.No.343 of 2021
Taxes, wherein, it is stipulated that appeal shall not be filed/pursued by the
Department before the High Court in cases where the tax effect does not exceed
Rs.1,00,00,000/- (Rupees One Crore). It is also submitted that the tax effect in this appeal is less than the threshold limit.
4. In the light of the aforesaid submissions made by the learned Standing Counsel for the appellant/Revenue, the present appeal, wherein, the tax effect is said to be less than the monetary limit imposed, is dismissed as withdrawn, keeping open the substantial questions of law for determination in an appropriate case. No costs.
Internet : Yes
gya
[R.M.D,J.] [M.S.Q, J.] 25.08.2022
To
1.The Deputy Commissioner of Income TaxCorporate Circle 2(2), Chennai-34
2.The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-6
Chennai-34
3.The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal
'C' Bench, Chennai
T.C.A.No.343 of 2021
R. MAHADEVAN, J.AND
MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J.
gya
Tax Case Appeal No.343 of 2021
25.08.2022
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.