Case LawHigh Court › The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax...

The Principal Commissioner Of Income Taxmadurai v. St. John Freight System Private Limitedc

High Court 19 Aug 2025 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
The Principal Commissioner Of Income Taxmadurai v. St. John Freight System Private Limitedc
Date of order
19 Aug 2025
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Principal Commissioner Of Income Taxmadurai v. St. John Freight System Private Limitedc, the High Court (2025) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: In that view of the matter, the appeal stands dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

T.C.A.No.465 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 19.08.2025 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CHIEF JUSTICEAND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN T.C.A.No.465 of 2023 The Principal Commissioner of Income TaxMadurai Appellant Vs St. John Freight System Private LimitedC-98, SIPCOT Complex,Harbour Express Road,Tuticorin-628 008 Respondent Prayer: Appeal filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal “B” Bench, Chennai, dated 6.4.2023 in ITA No.188/Mds/2019. ____________ Page 1 of 4 JUDGMENT (Delivered by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) Heard learned counsel for the appellant/Revenue and learned counsel for the respondent/assessee. 2. At the outset, learned counsel for the Revenue fairly submits that it is a case having low tax effect. Therefore, in view of the Circular No.05/2024 dated 15.03.2024 and Circular No.09/2024, dated 17.09.2024, issued by the Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, Central Board of Direct Taxes, Government of India, the appellant/Revenue does not wish to proceed with the matter, though the questions of law proposed may be kept open for consideration in the appropriate matter. ____________ Page 2 of 4 3. In that view of the matter, the appeal stands dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. (MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CJ) (SUNDER MOHAN,J) 19.08.2025 Index: Yes/NoNeutral Citation:Yes/Nobbr To: 1. The Assistant Registrar Income Tax Appellate Tribunal “B” Bench, Chennai. 2. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Chennai-34. Chennai-34. 3. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-1, Madurai-2. Central Circle-1, Madurai-2. ____________ Page 3 of 4 ____________ Page 4 of 4 T.C.A.No.465 of 2023 THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE ANDSUNDER MOHAN,J. bbr TCA No.465 of 2023 19.08.2025
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan