The Principal Commissioner Of Incometax 1Chennai v. M/S.balaji Hotels And Enterprises Ltd
High Court
25 Feb 2025 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
The Principal Commissioner Of Incometax 1Chennai v. M/S.balaji Hotels And Enterprises Ltd
Date of order
25 Feb 2025
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Principal Commissioner Of Incometax 1Chennai v. M/S.balaji Hotels And Enterprises Ltd, the High Court (2025) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
CMP NO. 3407 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 25-02-2025
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE S. S. SUNDAR
AND
THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE C. SARAVANAN
CMP NO. 3407 of 2025
in
TCA SR NO. 18782 OF 2025
The Principal Commissioner Of Incometax 1Chennai.
Vs
M/s.Balaji Hotels And Enterprises Ltd
No.17/1, Bazulliah Road, T.Nagar, Chennai - 600 017.
Appellant(s)
Respondent(s)
For Appellant(s):
M/s.RAVIKUMAR T
Avinash Krishnan Ravi
For Respondent(s):
CHENNAI
ORDER
(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble S.S.Sundar J.)
This petition is filed by the Income Tax Department to condone the delay of 198 days
in representing the above appeal. The petitioner/appellant has given satisfactory reasons
for the cause of delay in representing the above appeal.
2. This court is convinced with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the
petition. Accordingly, this petition is ordered and the delay of 198 days in representing the above appeal is condoned. The Registry is directed to number the appeal, if it is otherwise in order.
(S.S.SUNDAR J.) (C.SARAVANAN J.) 25-02-2025
CMP NO. 3407 of 2025 inTCA SR NO. 18782 of 2025
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.