Case Law › High Court › The Principal Commissioner Of Incometax...

The Principal Commissioner Of Incometax - 3, Mumbai v. Amit B. Borkar, Jj

High Court 17 Nov 2021 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

17 Nov 2021

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Principal Commissioner Of Incometax - 3, Mumbai v. Amit B. Borkar, Jj, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

PURTIPRASADPARABDigitally signed byPURTI PRASADPARABDate: 2021.11.1810:47:33 +0530 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 362 OF 2019 The Boston Consulting Group (India) Pvt. Ltd. V/s. The Principal Commissioner of IncomeTax - 3, Mumbai. ….Appellant ….Respondent Mr. Atul K. Jasani for Appellant.Mr. Sham V. Walve for Respondent. ----- ----- CORAM : K.R. SHRIRAM & AMIT B. BORKAR, JJ. DATED : 17[th] NOVEMBER 2021 P.C. : 1.Mr. Jasani seeks leave to withdraw the appeal. 2.Appeal dismissed as withdrawn. 3. Refund of court fee, if any, be paid in accordance with rules. ( AMIT B. BORKAR, J.) (K.R. SHRIRAM, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.