The Principal Commissioner Ofincome Tax-1, Nashik v. Radheshyam B. Agrawal
High Court
23 Feb 2018 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hcaurdb
Parties
The Principal Commissioner Ofincome Tax-1, Nashik v. Radheshyam B. Agrawal
Date of order
23 Feb 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In The Principal Commissioner Ofincome Tax-1, Nashik v. Radheshyam B. Agrawal, the High Court (2018) decided the matter.
Decision: 4.In view of above, appeal stands disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,BENCH AT AURANGABAD
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.78 OF 2015
The Principal Commissioner ofIncome Tax-1, Nashik
..Appellant
Versus
Radheshyam B. Agrawal
..Respondent
Mr D.V. Soman, Advocate for appellant - absent
CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA & A.M. DHAVALE, JJ
PER COURT
DATE : 23rd February 2018
1.None appears for the appellant.
2.As per the appeal memo, the tax liability involved in this appeal is Rs.15,95,158/-. The same is below Rs.20 lakhs. is Rs.15,95,158/-. The same is below Rs.20 lakhs.
3.In view of C.B.D.T. Circular dated 10.12.2015, the department has taken a policy decision not to prosecute the appeals wherein the tax effect is less than Rs.20 lakhs.
4.In view of above, appeal stands disposed of. No costs.
( A.M. DHAVALE, J.)
( S.V. GANGAPURWALA, J.)
vvr
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue