The Principal Commissioner Ofincome Tax, Panaji v. Soumit Ranjan Jena
High Court
23 Sep 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hcbgoa
Parties
The Principal Commissioner Ofincome Tax, Panaji v. Soumit Ranjan Jena
Date of order
23 Sep 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Principal Commissioner Ofincome Tax, Panaji v. Soumit Ranjan Jena, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.
Decision: 23.09.2019 3.The appeals are disposed of as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
1 TXA-4 & 6-2017 dtd. 23.09.2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
TAX APPEAL NO. 4 OF 2017
AND
TAX APPEAL NO. 6 OF 2017
THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX, PANAJI.,
... Appellant.
Versus
SOUMIT RANJAN JENA.,
... Respondent.
Ms. Susan Linhares, Standing Counsel for the Appellant.
Coram : M. S. SONAK &
NUTAN D. SARDESSAI, JJ.
Date : 23[rd] September, 2019.
Oral Order:(Per M. S. Sonak, J.)
Not on board. At the request of Ms. S. Linhares, learnedStanding Counsel for the Income Tax Department, these appeals aretaken on board.
2.At the request of Ms. Linhares, the appeals are permittedto be withdrawn since the same are covered under the instructionscontained in the CBDT Circular no. 17/2019 dated 08.08.2019.
2 TXA-4 & 6-2017 dtd. 23.09.2019
3.The appeals are disposed of as withdrawn.
NUTAN D. SARDESSAI, J. M. S. SONAK, J.
msr.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue