Case LawHigh Court › The Revenue In The Case Of Liberty India...

The Revenue In The Case Of Liberty India v. Commissioner Of

High Court 25 Jan 2011 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Revenue In The Case Of Liberty India v. Commissioner Of
Date of order
25 Jan 2011
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In The Revenue In The Case Of Liberty India v. Commissioner Of, the High Court (2011) decided the matter.

Issue: 3.Admit on the following question of law:- “Whether in the facts and the circumstances of the case and in law, the Hon'ble ITAT was right in allowing the appeal of the assessee and deleting the disallowance U/s.

Decision: 5.In this view of the matter, the order of the Tribunal is quashed and set aside and the matter is restored to the file of the ITAT for deciding the question afresh in the light of the order passed in Liberty India (Supra).

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

SSM IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 5622 OF 2010 The Commissioner of Income Tax-24VERSUS .... Appellant M/s. Witmans Industries .... Respondent Mr. Suresh Kumar for the Appellant.None of the Respondent. CORAM:J. P. DEVDHAR and MRIDULA BHATKAR J.J.DATED:JANUARY 25, 2011. P.C.: Heard. 2.None for the respondent. 3.Admit on the following question of law:- “Whether in the facts and the circumstances of the case and in law, the Hon'ble ITAT was right in allowing the appeal of the assessee and deleting the disallowance U/s. 80-IB of DEPB SSM Sale? 4.The learned Counsel for the revenue states that the question raised in this appeal is covered by the decision in favour of the revenue in the case of Liberty India V/s Commissioner of Income Tax reported in 317 SC 218. 5.In this view of the matter, the order of the Tribunal is quashed and set aside and the matter is restored to the file of the ITAT for deciding the question afresh in the light of the order passed in Liberty India (Supra). 6.As none appears for the respondent, the matter is remanded back. (MRIDULA BHATKAR, J) (J. P. DEVDHAR, J)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan