In The Revenue In The Case Of Liberty India v. Commissioner Of, the High Court (2011) decided the matter.
Issue: 3.Admit on the following question of law:- “Whether in the facts and the circumstances of the case and in law, the Hon'ble ITAT was right in allowing the appeal of the assessee and deleting the disallowance U/s.
Decision: 5.In this view of the matter, the order of the Tribunal is quashed and set aside and the matter is restored to the file of the ITAT for deciding the question afresh in the light of the order passed in Liberty India (Supra).
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
SSM
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 5622 OF 2010
The Commissioner of Income Tax-24VERSUS
.... Appellant
M/s. Witmans Industries
.... Respondent
Mr. Suresh Kumar for the Appellant.None of the Respondent.
CORAM:J. P. DEVDHAR and MRIDULA BHATKAR J.J.DATED:JANUARY 25, 2011.
P.C.:
Heard.
2.None for the respondent.
3.Admit on the following question of law:-
“Whether in the facts and the circumstances of the case and in law, the Hon'ble ITAT was right in allowing the appeal of the assessee and deleting the disallowance U/s. 80-IB of DEPB
SSM
Sale?
4.The learned Counsel for the revenue states that the
question raised in this appeal is covered by the decision in favour of
the revenue in the case of Liberty India V/s Commissioner of
Income Tax reported in 317 SC 218.
5.In this view of the matter, the order of the Tribunal is
quashed and set aside and the matter is restored to the file of the ITAT
for deciding the question afresh in the light of the order passed in Liberty India (Supra).
6.As none appears for the respondent, the matter is remanded back.
(MRIDULA BHATKAR, J)
(J. P. DEVDHAR, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.