The Said Substantial Question Of Law Having Been Considered And Answered In Favour Of The Assessee And Against The Revenue In The Case Of Cit v. M/S. Quest Global Engineering Service Pvt. Ltd.,In Ita
High Court
14 Dec 2021 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
The Said Substantial Question Of Law Having Been Considered And Answered In Favour Of The Assessee And Against The Revenue In The Case Of Cit v. M/S. Quest Global Engineering Service Pvt. Ltd.,In Ita
Date of order
14 Dec 2021
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Said Substantial Question Of Law Having Been Considered And Answered In Favour Of The Assessee And Against The Revenue In The Case Of Cit v. M/S. Quest Global Engineering Service Pvt. Ltd.,In Ita, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal under Section 14A of the Income-tax Act. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Resultantly, the appeal stands dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 14 DAY OF DECEMBER, 2021
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SUJATHA
AND
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.VISHWAJITH SHETTY
I.T.A.No.552/2016
BETWEEN:
1. The Pr. Commissioner of Income-Tax, CIT(A) 5[th] floor, BMTC Building, 80 feet road, Kormangala, Bangalore-560095. 5[th] floor, BMTC Building, 80 feet road, Kormangala, Bangalore-560095.
2. The Asst. Commissioner of Income-Tax, Circle-11(5), Present address Circle-4(1)(1), 2[nd] floor, BMTC Building, 80 feet road, Kormangala, Bangalore-560095.
… APPELLANTS
(By Sri K.V.Aravind, Adv.)
AND:
M/s. KBD Sugars & Distilleries Ltd., No.17, Sankey Road, Bangalore-560020.
… RESPONDENT
(By Sri V.Chandrashekar, for
Sri M.Lava, Adv.)
This ITA is filed under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act praying to set aside the orders passed by the ITAT, Bangalore, in ITA No.933/Bang/2013 dated 05.02.2016 and
confirm the order of the Appellate Commissioner confirming the order passed by the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-4(1)(1), Bengaluru.
This appeal coming on for Final Hearing, this day, S.Sujatha J., delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
1. This appeal is admitted to consider the following substantial question of law.
"Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in deleting the addition made under Section 14A r/w/s 8D(2)(ii) and (iii) holding that there was no fresh investment and the assessing authority has not expressed or recorded any satisfaction by identifying the expenditure which has been incurred in contravention to the provisions in Section 14A and also contrary to the Board's Circular No.14 of the 2001 and 5 of 2001?"
2. The said substantial question of law having been considered and answered in favour of the assessee and against the revenue in the case of CIT VS M/S. QUEST GLOBAL ENGINEERING SERVICE PVT. LTD.,in ITA No.133/2015 dated 15.02.2021, the said substantial
question of law is answered in favour of the assessee and against the revenue.
Resultantly, the appeal stands dismissed.
Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- JUDGE
KK
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.