Case LawHigh Court › The Trustees Of Vanita Vishram v. The Co...

The Trustees Of Vanita Vishram v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 31 Jul 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Trustees Of Vanita Vishram v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
31 Jul 2008
Assessment year(s)
1979-80
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In The Trustees Of Vanita Vishram v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX REFERENCE NO. 269 OF 1997 The Trustees of Vanita Vishram ..Applicant vs. The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Respondent Ms.Asifa Khana i/b Mr.S.M.Lala for applicant. Mr.R.A.Vaishampayan for respondent. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the applicant and Mr.Vaishampayan, learned Counsel appearing for the respondent. Mr.Vaishampayan undertakes to file vakalatnama in the above reference within one week from today. Learned Counsel for the applicant points out that for the Assessment Year 1979-80 and 1980-81 on the very same question of law which has been involved in the present reference, this Court, in the matter of Trustees of Vanita Vishram Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax reported in (2006) 280 ITR 345 (Bom), has taken a view that there is no dispute about the fact that the assessee existed only for educational purposes, viz. for running schools and not for the purposes of making profit. The assessee was entitled to exemption under section 10(22) on interest earned on surplus funds of the schools run by the assessee trust. In view thereof the question referred in the above reference is answered in favour of the assessee and against the revenue. KATHAWALLA J.) (Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN J.) (S.J.KATHAWALLA J.) (Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN J.) (S.J KATHAWALLA J.) (Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN J.) (S.J
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan