Case Law › High Court › Thecommissioner Of Incometax v. Mr. Ompr...

Thecommissioner Of Incometax v. Mr. Omprakash Agarwal

High Court 16 Feb 2008 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

16 Feb 2008

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Thecommissioner Of Incometax v. Mr. Omprakash Agarwal, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: PC : failure to pay the costs within stipulated period, appeal to stand dismissed for non prosecution. the office objections, appeal to stand dismissed for non prosecution. delay in filing the appeal was caused on account of their negligence.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Vs. Mr. Omprakash Agarwal. ..Respondent. Shri.B.M. Chatterji with Ms.P.P. Bhosale andP.S.Sahadevan for the Appellant. None for the Respondent. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO &R.S. MOHITE, JJ.DATED : 16TH FEBRUARY,2008. PC : failure to pay the costs within stipulated period, appeal to stand dismissed for non prosecution. the office objections, appeal to stand dismissed for non prosecution. delay in filing the appeal was caused on account of their negligence. (R.S. MOHITE, J.) (F.I. REBELLO, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.