Thecommissionerofincometax-Internationaltaxation -1 v. Ge Transportation Parts Llc
High Court
03 Sep 2019 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Thecommissionerofincometax-Internationaltaxation -1 v. Ge Transportation Parts Llc
Date of order
03 Sep 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Thecommissionerofincometax-Internationaltaxation -1 v. Ge Transportation Parts Llc, the High Court (2019) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: 59,52,684/-, the present appeal is disposed of as notpressed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
$~47
*INTHEHIGHCOURTOFDELHIATNEWDELHI+ITA 799/2019
THECOMMISSIONEROFINCOMETAX-INTERNATIONALTAXATION -1..... Appellant
Through:Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Advocate.
versus
GE TRANSPORTATION PARTS LLC
..... Respondent
Through:Mr. Sachit Jolly and Mr. ShobhitAhuja, Advocates.
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHIHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA
O R D E R%03.09.2019
C.M. No. 39497/2019 (exemption)
1. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
2. The application stands disposed of.
C.M. No. 39496/2019 (delay)
3. By this application the applicant seeks condonation of delay of 18 days infiling the application. For the reasons stated in the application, the delay iscondoned.
4. The application stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms.
ITA 799/2019
5. In light of the circular dated 08.08.2019 issued by the Ministry of Finance,Department of Revenue, Central Board of Direct Taxes (Judicial Section),
Government of India, which fixes the monetary limit in respect of tax effect,inter alia, before the High Court in which the Department could pursue thematter as Rs. 1,00,00,000/- and in view of the fact that the tax effect in thepresent case is Rs. 59,52,684/-, the present appeal is disposed of as notpressed.
J
VIPIN SANGHI,
SEPTEMBER 03, 2019nk
SANJEEV NARULA, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue