Case LawHigh Court › Thirumangalam,Chennai 600 101 v. Income...

Thirumangalam,Chennai 600 101 v. Income Tax Officer

High Court 21 Mar 2023 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Thirumangalam,Chennai 600 101 v. Income Tax Officer
Date of order
21 Mar 2023
Assessment year(s)
2018-19
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Thirumangalam,Chennai 600 101 v. Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2023) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Recording this, and in light of the endorsement made, this Writ Petition and the connected miscellenous petitions are dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

W.P.No.5243 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated: 21.03.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH W.P.No.5243 of 2020and W.M.P.Nos.6189, 6191 & 6192 of 2020 M/s Peacock Hospitals Private Limited, Represented by its Managing DirectorMr.M.Sreekiran 31/8, Welcome Colony, Anna Nagar West, Thirumangalam,Chennai 600 101. ... Petitioner Vs 1.Income Tax Officer, Corporate Ward 5(1), CHE 121, Uthamar Gandhi Salai, Nungambakkam, Chennai 600034. 2.Assistant Director of Income Tax Centralised Processing Centre Income Tax Department Bangalore 560 500. 3.M.Yamini 4.Monica ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records on the file of the second respondent and quash the impugned order passed by the Second respondent under section 143(1B) Income Tax Act, 1961in PAN dated02.11.2019inDocumentIdentificationNumber CPC/1819/V6/1901935524 for the AY 2018-19.https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis For Petitioner : Mr.N.V.Balaji DR.ANITA SUMANTH,J. For Respondents: Mr.Prabu Mukund Arun Kumar Junior Standing Counsel – R1 & R2 Mr.V.Rajesh – R3 Ms.Elakiya - R4 O R D E R Mr.N.V.Balaji, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner does not wish to pursue the Writ petition, since statutory appeal has been filed. He has also made an endorsement to that effect. 2. Recording this, and in light of the endorsement made, this Writ Petition and the connected miscellenous petitions are dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Index : Yes / NoSpeaking/non-speaking Order slTo 1.The Income Tax Officer, Corporate Ward 5(1), CHE 121, Uthamar Gandhi Salai, Nungambakkam, Chennai 600034. 21.03.2023 2.The Assistant Director of Income Tax Centralised Processing Centre Income Tax Department, Bangalore 560 500. W.P.No.5243 of 2020 and W.M.P.Nos.6189, 6191 & 6192 of 2020
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan