Thirumangalam,Chennai 600 101 v. Income Tax Officer
High Court
21 Mar 2023 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Thirumangalam,Chennai 600 101 v. Income Tax Officer
Date of order
21 Mar 2023
Assessment year(s)
2018-19
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Thirumangalam,Chennai 600 101 v. Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2023) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Recording this, and in light of the endorsement made, this Writ Petition and the connected miscellenous petitions are dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
W.P.No.5243 of 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated: 21.03.2023
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH
W.P.No.5243 of 2020and
W.M.P.Nos.6189, 6191 & 6192 of 2020
M/s Peacock Hospitals Private Limited,
Represented by its Managing DirectorMr.M.Sreekiran
31/8, Welcome Colony, Anna Nagar West,
Thirumangalam,Chennai 600 101.
... Petitioner
Vs
1.Income Tax Officer,
Corporate Ward 5(1), CHE
121, Uthamar Gandhi Salai,
Nungambakkam, Chennai 600034.
2.Assistant Director of Income Tax
Centralised Processing Centre
Income Tax Department
Bangalore 560 500.
3.M.Yamini
4.Monica
... Respondents
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records on the file of the second respondent and quash the impugned order passed by the Second respondent under section 143(1B) Income Tax Act, 1961in PAN dated02.11.2019inDocumentIdentificationNumber
CPC/1819/V6/1901935524 for the AY 2018-19.https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
For Petitioner : Mr.N.V.Balaji
DR.ANITA SUMANTH,J.
For Respondents: Mr.Prabu Mukund Arun Kumar Junior Standing Counsel – R1 & R2 Mr.V.Rajesh – R3 Ms.Elakiya - R4
O R D E R
Mr.N.V.Balaji, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner
does not wish to pursue the Writ petition, since statutory appeal has been filed.
He has also made an endorsement to that effect.
2. Recording this, and in light of the endorsement made, this Writ
Petition and the connected miscellenous petitions are dismissed as withdrawn.
No costs.
Index : Yes / NoSpeaking/non-speaking Order
slTo
1.The Income Tax Officer,
Corporate Ward 5(1), CHE
121, Uthamar Gandhi Salai,
Nungambakkam, Chennai 600034.
21.03.2023
2.The Assistant Director of Income Tax
Centralised Processing Centre
Income Tax Department, Bangalore 560 500.
W.P.No.5243 of 2020
and W.M.P.Nos.6189, 6191 & 6192 of 2020
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.