Thiruvanmiyur, Chennai - 600 041 v. The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax - 3,Room
High Court
06 Jan 2023 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Thiruvanmiyur, Chennai - 600 041 v. The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax - 3,Room
Date of order
06 Jan 2023
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Thiruvanmiyur, Chennai - 600 041 v. The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax - 3,Room, the High Court (2023) decided the matter.
Decision: Owing to the narrative thus far, captioned main Writ Petition and captioned Writ Miscellaneous Petition are disposed of as closed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 06.01.2023
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.SUNDAR
W.P.No.4903 of 2020andW.M.P.No.5800 of 2020
Ajith KumarSon of P.Subramani28-C-1 & 2, 4th Seaward Road,
Valmiki Nagar,
Thiruvanmiyur, Chennai - 600 041.
... Petitioner
Versus
The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax - 3,Room No.410, Main Building, IV Floor,121, Mahatma Gandhi Road,
Nungambakkam, Chennai-600 034.
... Respondent
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records in ITBA/COM/F/17/2019-20/1024428802(2) dated 29.01.2020 on the file of the respondent relating to
Block Assessment period 01.04.1996 to 17.07.2002 and quash the same.
For Petitioner:Ms.Sree Lakshmi Vallirepresenting Mr.G.BaskarFor Respondent:Mr.Prabhu Mukunth ArunkumarJunior standing counsel (Income Tax)representing Ms.Hema MuralikrishnanSenior standing counsel (Income Tax)
Page 1 of 6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
O R D E R
Matter mentioned at half past ten.
2. Ms.Sree Lakshmi Valli, learned counsel representing Mr.G.Baskar, counsel on record for writ petitioner and Mr.Prabhu Mukunth Arunkumar, learned Junior standing counsel (Income Tax) representing Ms.Hema Muralikrishnan, learned Senior standing counsel (Revenue counsel) for the respondent are before this Court.
3. Learned counsel for writ petitioner submits that the writ petitioner assessee has opted for the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 (3 of 2020) and Rules thereunder.
4. Learned counsel submits that the Form-5 with acknowledgment in this regard has been issued, a copy of the same has been placed before this Court and a scanned reproduction of the same is as follows:
Page 2 of 6
Page 3 of 6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
5. Learned counsel has made an endorsement in the case file and a
scanned reproduction of the same is as follows:
6. Learned counsel reiterates the aforementioned endorsement in the case file.
7. Owing to the narrative thus far, captioned main Writ Petition and
captioned Writ Miscellaneous Petition are disposed of as closed. Though
Page 4 of 6
obvious, it is made clear that this Court is not expressing any view or opinion
on the merits of the matter in this order. There shall be no order as to costs.
06.01.2023
Index : Yes/NoSpeaking Order/Non Speaking OrderNeutral Citation : Yes / No
mk
To
The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax - 3,Room No.410, Main Building, IV Floor,121, Mahatma Gandhi Road,Nungambakkam, Chennai-600 034.
Page 5 of 6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Page 6 of 6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
M.SUNDAR, J.mk
W.P.No.4903 of 2020andW.M.P.No.5800 of 2020
06.01.2023
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.