Case LawHigh Court › This Appeal Relates To Assessment Year 2...

This Appeal Relates To Assessment Year 2005-06 v. Sarkar Builders, Reported In (2015) 375 Itr 392

High Court 07 Jul 2017 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
This Appeal Relates To Assessment Year 2005-06 v. Sarkar Builders, Reported In (2015) 375 Itr 392
Date of order
07 Jul 2017
Assessment year(s)
2005-06
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In This Appeal Relates To Assessment Year 2005-06 v. Sarkar Builders, Reported In (2015) 375 Itr 392, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal.

Decision: As such, the appeal is dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 124 OF 2015 The Commissioner of Income Tax-V .. Appellant v/s. Shri Naresh Thakurdas Wadhwani .. Respondent Mr. Tejveer Singh for the appellant Mr. Rohan Deshpande for the respondent CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA & A.M. BADAR, J.J. P.C. DATED : 7[th] JULY, 2017 1.This appeal relates to Assessment Year 2005-06. 2.Mr. Tejveer Singh, learned Counsel for the appellant fairly concedes that the issue involved in the present appeal is covered by the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of the Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Sarkar Builders, reported in (2015) 375 ITR 392. 3.In view of the above, no substantial question of law arises. As such, the appeal is dismissed. No costs. (A.M. BADAR, J.) (S.V. GANGAPURWALA, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan