This Court In Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Tata Power Co
High Court
01 Aug 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
This Court In Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Tata Power Co
Date of order
01 Aug 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In This Court In Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Tata Power Co, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 5.The appeal is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 179 OF 2016
The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-2
.. Appellant
v/s.
Central Bank of India
..Respondent
Mr. Suresh Kumar a/w Ms. Swapna Gokhale for the appellant Mr. Madhur Agarwal I/b Mr. Tejas Shah for the respondent
CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA &
SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J.J.
DATED : 1[st] AUGUST, 2018.
P.C.
1. This Appeal under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961(the Act) challenges the order dated 16[th] April, 2015 passed by theIncome Tax Appellate Tribunal (the Tribunal). This appeal relates toAssessment Year 1989-90.
2.The Revenue has urged only the following question of law for ourconsideration :-
“Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and inlaw, the Tribunal was justified in holding that the interest portionof the refund issued earlier has to be ignored for the purpose of
calculating interest u/s 244A of the Income Tax Act, 1961?
3.Mr. Suresh Kumar, learned Counsel appearing for the Revenuevery fairly states that the issue raised herein stands concluded againstthe Revenue and in favour of the respondent assessee by the decision of
this Court in Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. M/s. Tata Power Co.
Ltd. (Income Tax Appeal No.1560 of 2013), decided on 7[th] July, 2015.
4.In the above view, the question as proposed does not give rise toany substantial question of law. Thus, not entertained.
5.The appeal is dismissed. No order as to costs.
(SANDEEP K. SHINDE J.)
(M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.