Case LawHigh Court › This Court In Ita v. M/S Abc Papers

This Court In Ita v. M/S Abc Papers

High Court 11 Jul 2019 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
This Court In Ita v. M/S Abc Papers
Date of order
11 Jul 2019
Assessment year(s)
2012-2013
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In This Court In Ita v. M/S Abc Papers, the High Court (2019) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Appeal stands disposed of.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA|AT CHANDIGARH ITA No.397 of 2018 (O&M)Date of decision : 11.07.2019 Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-1, Chandigarh ...... Appellant VeTSuU Kuantum Paper Ltd., SCO 18-19, First FloorSector 8-C, Madhya Marg, Chandigarh. ...... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY TEWARTHON'BLE MR.JUSTICEHARNARESH SINGH GILL... Present :Mr. Yogesh Putney, Advocate and Mr. Ajiteshwar Singh, Advocate for the appellant. ... AJAY TEWARI, J. (Oral) CM2JaAT52CI]22018 For the reasons recorded, the application is allowed. Delay of 33 days in re-filing the appeal is condoned. Main case This appeal has been filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short ‘the Act’) against the order of the Income TaxAppellate Tribunal, New Delhi Bench-D in ITA No.1345/Del/2017 dated01.09.2017 for the Assessment Year 2012-2013. This Court in ITA No.130 of 2018 passed in |Pr,Commissioner of Income Tax-l, Chandigarh Vs. M/s ABC Papers Limited,decided on 07.02.2019 has already disposed of the matterinvolving the identical issues. ITA No.397 of 2018 (O&M) Today the learned counsel for the appellant has argued that itwould actually be this Court which would have the jurisdiction in view ofSection 127 (4) of the Act as interpreted by the Delhi High Court inCommissioner of Income Tax Vs. AAR BEE Industries, Income TaxReports, Vol. 357 (542). In our considered opinion, this Court would be bound by thedecision of the Division Bench of this Court which was rendered inThe Commissioner ofIncome Tax, Faridabad Vs. M/s Motorola India Ltd.,|(2010) 326 ITR 156and in ITA No.130 of 2018 decided on 07.02.2019titled as Pr. Commissioner ofIncome Tax-1, Chandigarh Vs. M/s ABCPapers Limitedandconsequently return the same in original forpresentation in the competent Court ofjurisdiction. Appeal stands disposed of. Since the main case has been disposed of, the pending C.M.Application, if any, also stands disposed of, (AJAY TEWARITJUDGE (HARNARESH SINGH GILL)JUDGE July 11, 2019pooja sharma-lWhether speaking/reasonedYes/NoWhether Reportable |Yes/No
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan