This Petition Relates To Assessment Year 2016-2017 v. Deputy Commissioner
High Court
05 Mar 2024 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newas
Parties
This Petition Relates To Assessment Year 2016-2017 v. Deputy Commissioner
Date of order
05 Mar 2024
Assessment year(s)
2016-2017
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In This Petition Relates To Assessment Year 2016-2017 v. Deputy Commissioner, the High Court (2024) decided the matter.
Decision: All consequential notices issued forAssessment Year 2016-2017, the assessment order and theconsequential orders, if any, are also hereby quashed and set aside.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
1/2 914-aswp-10839-2022.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYCIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 10839 OF 2022
Umesh Arun Jagtap…PetitionerVersusIncome Tax Officer & Ors.…Respondents
Ms. Deepa Khare i/b Mint and Confreres for Petitioner.Mr. Ajeet Manwani for Respondents-Revenue.
PC :
CORAM:K. R. SHRIRAM &DR. NEELA GOKHALE, JJ.DATED:5[th] March 2024
1.This petition relates to Assessment Year 2016-2017.
2.Counsels state that the issue of improper sanction having beenobtained has been raised among other grounds, in the petition aswell as during the hearing. Counsels further state that the issue ofimproper sanction has been decided by this Court in the case ofSiemens Financial Services Private Limited v. Deputy Commissioner
of Income Tax and Ors.[1], wherein the Court has held that forAssessment Year 2016-2017, the sanction should have been givenunder Section 151(ii) and not under Section 151(i) of the IncomeTax Act, 1961 (“the Act”) and consequently, the sanction is invalid.The Court has stated that in view of the invalid sanction, the noticeissued itself will be invalid and has to be quashed. We would also
Digitally signedby GITALAXMIGITALAXMIKRISHNAKRISHNAKOTAWADEKARKOTAWADEKARDate:2024.03.0814:18:33 +0545by GITALAXMIGITALAXMIKRISHNAKRISHNAKOTAWADEKARKOTAWADEKARDate:2024.03.0814:18:33 +0545
add, if the notice has to be quashed, if there is an assessment order
passed subsequently, the assessment order having been passed relyingon an incorrect sanction, will also have to be quashed.
3.Counsels further state that the findings in Siemens FinancialServices Private Limited (supra) will squarely apply to this petition.Therefore, all notices and orders impugned in this petition arequashed and set aside. All consequential notices issued forAssessment Year 2016-2017, the assessment order and theconsequential orders, if any, are also hereby quashed and set aside.
4.Petition disposed.
5. We clarify that all other grounds could be raised by the partiesat appropriate stage in any other proceeding.
(DR. NEELA GOKHALE, J.)
(K. R. SHRIRAM, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.