Thottathil B.radhakrishnan, J v. In The Result, This Writ Appeal Is Dismissed
High Court
06 Oct 2015 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Thottathil B.radhakrishnan, J v. In The Result, This Writ Appeal Is Dismissed
Date of order
06 Oct 2015
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Thottathil B.radhakrishnan, J v. In The Result, This Writ Appeal Is Dismissed, the High Court (2015) dismissed the appeal under Section 194H of the Income-tax Act.
Decision: In the result, this writ appeal is dismissed. [SECTION] ## Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan, Judge [SECTION] ## Anu Sivaraman, Judge
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN &
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN
TUESDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2015/14TH ASWINA, 1937
WA.No. 1448 of 2006 (E) IN WP(C).17657/2003 ---------------------------------------------
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 17657/2003 DATED 20-06-2005
APPELLANT/4TH RESPONDENT:
-----------------------------------
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,COCHIN COCHIN, INCOME TAX MAIN BUILDING, I.S.PRESS ROAD, COCHIN - 18.
BY ADVS.SRI.P.K.R.MENON,SR.COUNSEL, GOI(TAXES) SRI.GEORGE K. GEORGE, SC FOR IT
RESPONDENTS:
----------------
1. SHRI.C.C.VARGHESE
S/O. CHAKKUNN;Y, CHERUVATHUR HOUSE, WARD NO.2
S.N. PARK P.O., POOTHOLE, THRISSUR DISTRICT.
2. THE OFFICE OF THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
3. THE DISTRICT TREASURY OFFICER,
THRISSUR.
4. THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED
BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT (TAXES) THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
R1 BY ADV. SRI.G.SREEKUMAR (CHELUR)
R2-4 BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.A.RENJITH
THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06-10-2015,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN &ANU SIVARAMAN, JJ.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
W.A.No.1448 of 2006
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =Dated this the 6[th] day of October, 2015
JUDGMENT
Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan, J.
This writ appeal arises from the judgment in relation to levy ofincome tax on 'commission' or 'brokerage' due to stamp vendorsin the State. The learned single Judge decided the issue applyingthe ratio of the decision of the Gujarat High Court inAhmedabad Stamp Vendors Association v. Union of India[(2002 (257) ITR 2020]. It is submitted that the said judgmentstands affirmed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India. Undersuch circumstances and having regard to the contents of Section194H of the Income Tax Act, we find no ground to interfere withthe decision of the learned single Judge. The writ appeal,therefore, fails.
In the result, this writ appeal is dismissed.
Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan, Judge
Anu Sivaraman, Judge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.