Thr Hon’ble Mr. Justickhkh Ravi v. Hosma
High Court
25 Nov 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Thr Hon’ble Mr. Justickhkh Ravi v. Hosma
Date of order
25 Nov 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Thr Hon’ble Mr. Justickhkh Ravi v. Hosma, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THR HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BBNGALURU
DATRKRD THIS THR DAY OF NOVEMBER 2029
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE
AN ]
THR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICKHKH RAVI V. HOSMA
R.P. NO.429 OF 2021IN1.T.A. NO.258 OF 2020C/WR.P.NO.430/2021IN
1.T.A. NO.481 OF 2014
IN R.P. NO.429 OF 2021IN I.T.A. NO.258 OF 2020
BETWEEN:
iDEPUTY COMMISSONER OF INCOME TAXCIRCLE - 1, UDUPICIRCLE - 1, UDUPI
(FORMERLY ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER
OF INCOME TAX, UDUPI RANGE).
DQ|COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX.ATTAVARA, MANGALORE - 3575 OO1ATTAVARA, MANGALORE - 3575 OO1
_.. PHTITIONERS
(BY SRI. E.I. SANMATHI, ADV..,)
AND:
CANARA BANK(FOR AMALGAMATED ENTITYSYNDICATE BANK)HEBEAD J C ROABBNGALURU - 560 OO?RBPRESEBENTBD HBRBIN BY ITSCHIBF GENBRAL MANAGERMR. V RAMACHANDRA.
— RBSPONDENT
(BY MR. T. SURYANARAYANA, SR. COUNSEL FORMRS. TANMAYEE RAJKUMAR, ADV., )
THIS RBVIBW PRTITION IS FILED UNDER ORDER 47|RULE 1 R/W SECTION 114 OF CPC, PRAYING TO REVIEW|JUDGMENT.DATED08/02/2021PASSEDIN ITANO..2098/2020. TO PASS SUITABLE ORDERS THAT THIS HON'BLECOURT DEBMS FIT TO BRE GRANTBD IN THR FACTS ANDCIRCUMSTANCES OF THR CASK IN THR I[INTRBREST JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
IN R.P. NO.430 OF 2021IN I.T.A. NO.481 OF 2014
BETWEEN:
1. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXICHNTRAL REVENUBS BUILDINGATTAVARA, MANGALORE - 575 OO1. CHNTRAL REVENUBS BUILDINGATTAVARA, MANGALORE - 575 OO1.
2. THHK DEPUTY COMMISSIONER|OF INCOME TAX |CIRCLE-1, CANARA TOWERS.MISSION HOSPITAL ROAD UDUPI-576101.
(BY SRI. E.I. SANMATHI, ADV..,)
_.. PRHTITIONERS
3
AND:
SYNDICATEH BANK(CANARA BANK FOR AMALGAMATEDENTITY SYNDICATE BANK)HEAD OFFICE, MANIPAL - 576104.RBPRESEKENTED BY ITASSISTANT GBNBRAL MANAGER|MR. R. RAMALINGAM.
— RBSPONDENT
(BY MR. T. SURYANARAYANA, SR. COUNSEL FORMRS. TANMAYEE RAJKUMAR, ADV., )
THIS RBVIBW PRTITION IS FILED UNDER ORDER 47|RULE 1 R/W SECTION 114 OF CPC, PRAYING TO REVIEW|JUDGMENT.DATED31/01/2020PASSEDIN ITANO..481/2014. TO PASS SUITABLE ORDERS THAT THIS HON'BLECOURT DEBMS FIT TO BRE GRANTBD IN THR FACTS ANDCIRCUMSTANCES OF THR CASK IN THR I[INTRBREST JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THESE.REVIEWPRTITIONS|COMING.ON|KORADMISSION, THIS DAY,|ALOK ARADHE J.,DELIVBRED THEFOLLOWING:
ORDER
This petition has been filed seeking review of the
judgmentdatedO8.02.2021passedinITA
No.258/2020.
After hearing the learned counsel for thepetitioner, in our considered opinion, the judgment
neither suffers from jurisdictional infirmity nor any.error apparent on the face of the record warrantinginterference of this court in exercise otf reviewjurisdiction.
In the result, the review petition fails and ishereby dismissed.
Sd/-.JUDGE.
Sd/-.JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.