Case Law › High Court › Tirlochan Singh v. Commissioner Of Incom...

Tirlochan Singh v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Patiala And Another

High Court 07 May 2013 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · phhc

Parties

Date of order

07 May 2013

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Tirlochan Singh v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Patiala And Another, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.12567 of 1990Date of decision:07.05.2013 Tirlochan Singh Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, Patiala and another ...Petitioner ...Respondents CORAM:Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jasbir Singh, Acting Chief Justice Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kumar Jain Present:None for the petitioner. Mr. Rajesh Katoch, Advocate, for the respondents. ***** Jasbir Singh, ACJ (Oral) Case has been called several times. However, no-one came present to assist the Court. Same was the position on 07.03.2013. On 15.02.1991, following order was passed by this Court:- “Admitted. To be listed for hearing on 25.03.1991. Assessment proceedings in pursuance of theimpugned notice are stayed meanwhile.” The matter is peding for the last 23 years and no body is coming forward to prosecute the same, as is evident from the absence onthe last two consecutive dates. Dismissed for non-prosecution. (Jasbir Singh)Acting Chief Justice (Rakesh Kumar Jain) Judge

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.