Case LawHigh Court › Tirupati Balaji Fibers Limited v. Princi...

Tirupati Balaji Fibers Limited v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax & Ors

High Court 11 Jan 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Tirupati Balaji Fibers Limited v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax & Ors
Date of order
11 Jan 2016
Assessment year(s)
2007-08
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Tirupati Balaji Fibers Limited v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax & Ors, the High Court (2016) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: The writ petition stands disposed of with the aforesaid direction.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

$~86 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI +W.P.(C) 230/2016 TIRUPATI BALAJI FIBERS LIMITED..... PetitionerThrough:Mr Ankit Gupta and Mr Dinesh Mohan versus PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ORS. ..... RespondentsThrough:Mr Ashok K. Manchanda CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMEDHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVAO R D E R%11.01.2016 CM No. 978/2016 (exemption) The exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. W.P.(C) 230/2016 and CM No. 977/2016 One of the grievances of the petitioner is that the appeal filed by the petitionerbefore the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) in respect of the assessment year2007-08 is not being taken up for hearing. On the other hand, the department is pressingfor demands which have been raised by virtue of the assessment order which is underappeal. It is further contended that the stay which was prayed for before the AssessingOfficer has also been rejected. We have heard the learned counsel for the parties at the first instance and we aredisposing of this writ petition with the direction that the concerned Commissioner ofIncome Tax (Appeals) shall dispose of the appeal filed by the petitioner as expeditiouslyas possible and preferably within eight weeks. In the meanwhile, it would also be open to the petitioner to move an application before the Commissioner of Income Tax for stayof the demand. The writ petition stands disposed of with the aforesaid direction. Dasti. BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J JANUARY 11, 2016SU SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan