Tkde Commissioner Of Income Tax Delhi-Iv v. Indraprastha Gas Ltd
High Court
27 Jan 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Tkde Commissioner Of Income Tax Delhi-Iv v. Indraprastha Gas Ltd
Date of order
27 Jan 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Tkde Commissioner Of Income Tax Delhi-Iv v. Indraprastha Gas Ltd, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
o
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
*
ITA 67/2016 & CM No.989/2016
+
TKDE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX DELHI-IV .... AppellantThrough: Mr Raghvendra Singh, Junior StandingCounsel.
versus
INDRAPRASTHA GAS LTD.
.... Respondent
Through
AND
5.
+ITA 68/2016 & CM No.990-991/2016THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXDELHI-IV
Appellant
Through: Mr Raghvendra Singh, Junior StandingCounsel.
versus
INDRAPRASTHA GAS LTD. Respondent
Through
CORAM:
JUSTICE S.MURALIDHARJUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRUORDER%27.01.2016
%
1. There is an extraordinary delay of 1075 days in re-filing the appeals. The
explanation offered is the standard one regarding the practice directionsissued by this Court for e-filing of the appeals. As has already been observedby this Court in several orders, the practice directions were issued after
/ "" \VJ
consultation with the bar and after giving sufficient time for the bar to getacquainted with the requirement of e-filing. Additionally, the Court has alsoprovided scanning machines at the filing counter so that no difficulty iscaused to the bar for switching over to the system of e-filing. In any event,the delay of over two years and nine months on this ground is whollyunacceptable. Consequently, the Court is not persuaded to condone theextraordinary delay of 1075 days in re-filing the appeals.
2. CM Nos.989-991/2016 are dismissed. Consequently, the appeals aredismissed.
S.MURALIDHAR, J
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
JANUARY 27,2016MK
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.