Case LawHigh Court › T.k.jaju3.Dinakaran v. The Income Tax Of...

T.k.jaju3.Dinakaran v. The Income Tax Officer,Corporate Ward - 6(1),Room

High Court 17 Aug 2020 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
T.k.jaju3.Dinakaran v. The Income Tax Officer,Corporate Ward - 6(1),Room
Date of order
17 Aug 2020
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In T.k.jaju3.Dinakaran v. The Income Tax Officer,Corporate Ward - 6(1),Room, the High Court (2020) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICEM.NIRMAL KUMAR Crl.O.P.No.3969 of 2017andCrl.MP.No.2960 of 2017 1.M/s.Salt Creatives Pvt., Ltd.,Rep by its Director Shri T.K.Jaju. 2.T.K.Jaju3.Dinakaran ... Petitioners/Accused- Vs. - The Income Tax Officer,Corporate Ward - 6(1),Room No.704, 7th Floor, Wanaparthy Block,121, Mahathma Gandhi Road,Chennai - 600 034. ... Respondent Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482Cr.P.C. praying to call for the entire records in E.O.C.C.No.158of 2016, on the file of the Additional Chief MetropolitanMagistrate, (E.O.II) Egmore, Allikulam Road, Chennai and quashall further proceeding against the accused. For Petitioners:Mr.P.Ramesh Kumar For Respondent :Shri.L.Murali Krihnan Special Public Prosecutor O R D E R This Criminal Original Petition has been filed seekingto call for the entire records in E.O.C.C.No.158 of 2016, on thefile of the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, (E.O.II)Egmore, Allikulam Road, Chennai and quash all further proceedingagainst the accused. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitsthat during the pendency of the above case between thepetitioner and the Income Tax Department, the issues and disputesettled, since the offence is compoundable in nature. Inview of the compounding nature of the offence, the petition maybe dismissed as with drawn, since the Criminal case against thepetitioner is to be withdrawn. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 3. The learned Special Public Prosecutor submits thatthe matter has been settled and compounded and after physicalfunctioning of the Court , the petition would be filed beforethe concerned Court and complaint would be withdrawn. 4. Recording the submission of the Special Public Prosecutorthat the cases before the Trial Court is to be withdrawn. Hence,this Criminal Original Petition is closed. Consequently,connected miscellaneous petition is closed. s/d- Assistant Registrar True Copy Sub-Assistant Registrar ub To 1.The Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, (E.O.II) Egmore, Allikulam Road, Chennai.2.The Income Tax Officer,Corporate Ward - 6(1),Room No.704, 7th Floor, Wanaparthy Block,121, Mahathma Gandhi Road,Chennai - 600 034.Crl.O.P.No.3969 of 2017 VGII(CO)SP(05/10/2020)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan