T.k.rajalakshmi v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Non-Corporate Circle-2, Room
High Court
02 Mar 2021 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
T.k.rajalakshmi v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Non-Corporate Circle-2, Room
Date of order
02 Mar 2021
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In T.k.rajalakshmi v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Non-Corporate Circle-2, Room, the High Court (2021) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN
W.P. No. 11149 of 2016andW.M.P. No. 9683 of 2016
T.K.Rajalakshmi,W/o.T.K.Kumara Swamy... Petitioner Vs
1. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Non-corporate Circle-2, Room No.320, Wanaparthy Block, 3[rd] Floor, 121, Nungambakkam High Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai – 600 034.
2. The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-I, 121, Nungambakkam High Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai – 600 034.... Respondents
Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitutionof India to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for therecords of the 1[st]respondent in PAN: /NCC-2/281B/2015-16, dated 22.2.2016 attaching provisionally thepetitioner's lone residential property situated in No.69/A,Star Glow, Chamiers Road, R.A.Puram, Chennai.
For Petitioner : Mr.S.Sivaraman For Respondents: Ms.Hema Muralikrishnan Senior Standing Counsel
The petitioner has challenged the impugned order passedby the 1[st] respondent under Section 281B of the Income Tax Act,1961. The validity of the impugned order is dated 22.02.2016,is for a period of six months from the date of the said order.
2. As per the proviso, the order passed under Section281B of the Income Tax Act, 1961, an order issued may beextended for a period not exceeding two years or for a periodof sixty days after the date of order of the Assessment or re-assessment. Since, almost four years have lapsed, theimpugned order has lost its potency/vigour in terms of thehttps://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/proviso to sub-section 2 of Section 281B of the Income Tax
Act, 1961. Therefore, nothing survives for adjudication inthis writ petition and no further orders are required to bepassed.
3. Therefore, this Writ Petition is closed. Thepetitioner is given liberty to intimate the final outcome ofthe writ petition and have the order of attachment lifted. Nocosts. Consequently, connected writ miscellaneous petition isclosed.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS VI)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant RegistrararbTo
1. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Non-corporate Circle-2, Room No.320, Wanaparthy Block, 3[rd] Floor, 121, Nungambakkam High Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai – 600 034.
2. The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-I, 121, Nungambakkam High Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai – 600 034.
+1cc to Mr.S.Sivaraman, Advocate, S.R.No.13107.+1cc to M/s.Hema Muralikrishnan, Advocate, S.R.No.13308.
PL(CO)CSR 26.03.2021
W.P. No. 11149 of 2016and
W.M.P. No. 9683 of 2016
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.