Tne Commissioner Of Income Tax, Patiala v. M/S Industrial Cables (India) Ltd., Rajpura
High Court
11 Feb 2019 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Tne Commissioner Of Income Tax, Patiala v. M/S Industrial Cables (India) Ltd., Rajpura
Date of order
11 Feb 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Tne Commissioner Of Income Tax, Patiala v. M/S Industrial Cables (India) Ltd., Rajpura, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT QF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT |CHANDIGARH
LTA-248-2015 |(O&M)Date of decision:- 11.02.2019
Tne Commissioner of Income Tax, Patiala
.. Appellant
Versus
M/s Industrial Cables (India) Ltd., Rajpura
.. Respondent
CORAM* HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA MURARITCHIEF JUSTICEHON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN PALLI
Present:- Mr. Rajesn Katoch, Aavocate,
for the appellant.Mr. Pankaj Jain, Senior Aavocate, with Mr. Divya Suri, Advocate,for the respondent.
x KK*
KRISHNA MURARI[C.J.(ORAL)
Learned counsel for the appellant-revenue states that|since the tax effect involved is219,46,653/-, he has instructionsto withdraw the present appeal in view of Circular No. 03/2018,dated 11.07.2018 issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes, New|Delhi. However, he has prayed tnat liberty be granted to the revenueto file an application for revival of the appeal in case somethingsurvives tnerein.
2.|Dismissed as witndrawn with Liberty as prayed for. It 1s,however, Clarified that withdrawal of the appeal by the revenue|snall not pe taken to be affirmation of order of the Tribunal on merits. Further, the legal issue as claimed by the revenue 1s beingleft open to be adjudicated 1n an appropriate case.
(KRISHNA MURART)
CHILEF JUSTICE
(ARUN PALLT)JUDGE
11.02.2019
Anodh|
AMODH SHARMAWnetner s'eakin=/reasonedYes/No|2019.02.13 12:21Whether re'ortableYes/NoI attest to the accuracy andintegrity of this document
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.