Tne Haryana State Co-Operative Supply And v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Chandigarh
High Court
19 Sep 2014 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Tne Haryana State Co-Operative Supply And v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Chandigarh
Date of order
19 Sep 2014
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Tne Haryana State Co-Operative Supply And v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Chandigarh, the High Court (2014) decided the matter.
Issue: (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner states that inspite of hisefforts he has not been able to get instructions from the petitioner andunable to apprise the Court as to whether something survives in thewrit petition or not.
Decision: 2.In view of the above, tne present petition is disposed of asinfructuous.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA|AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.2089 of 2001 (O&M)Date of Decision:19.09.2014
Tne Haryana State Co-operative Supply and .. PetitionerMarketing Federation Limited |
Versus
The Commissioner of Income Tax, Chandigarh .. Respondentsand anotner
CORAM:HON BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTALHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FATEH DEEP SINGH
Present: Mr. Rajesh Garg, Senior Advocate with
Mr. Hitesh Pandit, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Tajender K. Joshi, Advocatefor the respondents.
AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. (ORAL)
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that inspite of hisefforts he has not been able to get instructions from the petitioner andunable to apprise the Court as to whether something survives in thewrit petition or not.
2.In view of the above, tne present petition is disposed of asinfructuous. It shall, however, be open to the petitioner to move anapplication for revival of the present writ petition, in case somethingsurvives therein.
(AJAY KUMAR MITTAL)JUDGE
September 19, 2014aart!
(FATEH DEEP SINGH)
JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue