Case LawHigh Court › Tolaram v. Chudiwala (Huf)V/S. The Commi...

Tolaram v. Chudiwala (Huf)V/S. The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Central-I, Bombay

High Court 22 Jul 2016 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Tolaram v. Chudiwala (Huf)V/S. The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Central-I, Bombay
Date of order
22 Jul 2016
Assessment year(s)
1992-93
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Tolaram v. Chudiwala (Huf)V/S. The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Central-I, Bombay, the High Court (2016) decided the matter.

Decision: 3.The Reference is disposed of in the above terms.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX REFERENCE NO. 131 OF 2000 Tolaram V. Chudiwala (HUF)v/s. The Commissioner of Income Tax,Central-I, Bombay .. Applicant .. Respondent None for the applicant None for the respondent P.C. CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA & A.K. MENON, J.J. DATED : 22[nd] JULY, 2016. 1.This Reference under Section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) relates to Assessment Year 1992-93. None appears on behalf of the applicant assessee in support of this Reference. 2.It appears that the applicant-assessee is not interested in pursuing the present Reference. Accordingly, the Reference is being returned unanswered. The questions as framed for our opinion are left open to be considered in an appropriate case, if not already decided. 3.The Reference is disposed of in the above terms. (A.K. MENON, J.) (M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan