Tolaram v. Chudiwala (Huf)V/S. The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Central-I, Bombay
High Court
22 Jul 2016 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Tolaram v. Chudiwala (Huf)V/S. The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Central-I, Bombay
Date of order
22 Jul 2016
Assessment year(s)
1992-93
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Tolaram v. Chudiwala (Huf)V/S. The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Central-I, Bombay, the High Court (2016) decided the matter.
Decision: 3.The Reference is disposed of in the above terms.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX REFERENCE NO. 131 OF 2000
Tolaram V. Chudiwala (HUF)v/s. The Commissioner of Income Tax,Central-I, Bombay
.. Applicant
.. Respondent
None for the applicant None for the respondent
P.C.
CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA & A.K. MENON, J.J.
DATED : 22[nd] JULY, 2016.
1.This Reference under Section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) relates to Assessment Year 1992-93. None appears on behalf of the applicant assessee in support of this Reference.
2.It appears that the applicant-assessee is not interested in pursuing the present Reference. Accordingly, the Reference is being returned unanswered. The questions as framed for our opinion are left
open to be considered in an appropriate case, if not already decided.
3.The Reference is disposed of in the above terms.
(A.K. MENON, J.)
(M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.