Tony Francisaged 42 Yearspattuparambil House, Chammini Road, Kaloor, Ernakulam, Kochi v. Menonmeera V.menonr.sreejith
High Court
23 Jun 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Tony Francisaged 42 Yearspattuparambil House, Chammini Road, Kaloor, Ernakulam, Kochi v. Menonmeera V.menonr.sreejith
Date of order
23 Jun 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Tony Francisaged 42 Yearspattuparambil House, Chammini Road, Kaloor, Ernakulam, Kochi v. Menonmeera V.menonr.sreejith, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.
Decision: The writ petition is disposed of as above. ajt sd/- GOPINATH P.JUDGE WP(C) NO.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P.
THURSDAY, THE 23 DAY OF JUNE 2022 / 2ND ASHADHA, 1944WP(C) NO. 5830 OF 2022
PETITIONER/S:
TONY FRANCISAGED 42 YEARSPATTUPARAMBIL HOUSE, CHAMMINI ROAD, KALOOR, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI-682017.BY ADVS.HARISANKAR V. MENONMEERA V.MENONR.SREEJITH
RESPONDENT/S:
1THE INCOME TAX OFFICERWARD-1(5), RANGE-1, NON-CORPORATE, C.R.BUILDING, I.S.PRESS ROAD, KOCHI-682018.
2SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (LA) NO.1ERNAKULAM, KOCHI-682030.
KOCHI METRO RAIL PROJECT, CIVIL STATION, KAKKANAD,
SRI. CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM (SC)
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON23.06.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C) NO. 5830 OF 2022 2
JUDGMENT
Petitioner has approached this Court, seeking refund of taxpaid on compensation received under the Right to FairCompensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition,Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013.
2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitsthat, without being aware of the fact that the petitioner isexempted from paying tax on capital gains in respect of amountsreceived as compensation under the provisions of the aforesaidAct, petitioner had remitted tax with the Department. It issubmitted that the petitioner has now approached the PrincipalCommissioner of Income Tax by filing an application under Section264 of the Income Tax Act along with an application forcondonation of delay.
3.Having regard to the aforesaid facts, this writ petitionwill stand disposed of, directing the Principal Commissioner ofIncome Tax, Central Revenue Building, I.S. Press Road,Ernakulam, Kochi to consider and pass orders on Ext.P8application filed under Section 264 of the Income Tax Act , afteraffording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, within a
WP(C) NO. 5830 OF 2022 3
period of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copyof this judgment.
The writ petition is disposed of as above.
ajt
sd/-
GOPINATH P.JUDGE
WP(C) NO. 5830 OF 2022 4
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 5830/2022
PETITIONER EXHIBITS
Exhibit P1
Exhibit P2
Exhibit P3
Exhibit P4
Exhibit P5
Exhibit P6
Exhibit P7
COPY OF PROCEEDINGS ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
COPY OF PROCEEDINGS ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
COPY OF THE RETURN FILED BY THE PETITIONER ALONG WITH FORM 26AS.
COPY OF LETTER SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT.
COPY OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT RECEIVED FROM THE 1ST RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER.
COPY OF CIRCULAR NO.36/16 ISSUED BY THE CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES, NEW DELHI.COPY OF JUDGMENT IN WA NO.1528/2016 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.