Case LawHigh Court › Top Security Ltd.(Formerly Tops Detectiv...

Top Security Ltd.(Formerly Tops Detective & Securityservices Ltd.), Mumbai v. Jt. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Ocd) & Others

High Court 28 Jul 2011 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Top Security Ltd.(Formerly Tops Detective & Securityservices Ltd.), Mumbai v. Jt. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Ocd) & Others
Date of order
28 Jul 2011
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Top Security Ltd.(Formerly Tops Detective & Securityservices Ltd.), Mumbai v. Jt. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Ocd) & Others, the High Court (2011) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Accordingly appeal is allowed to be withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 3761 OF 2010 Top Security Ltd.(Formerly Tops Detective & SecurityServices Ltd.), Mumbai ...Appellant. Vs. Jt. Commissioner of Income Tax (OCD) & Others ..Respondent Mr.Jitendra Singh for the Appellant. Mr. Suresh Kumar for the Respondent. CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND A.A. SAYED, JJ. DATE : 28TH JULY, 2011. P.C. 1. Learned Counsel for the appellant on instructions seeks to withdraw the appeal.the appeal. 2. Accordingly appeal is allowed to be withdrawn. 3. Refund of Court fees as per rules. ( A.A. SAYED, J. ) ( J.P. DEVADHAR , J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan