Topman Exports v. Kalpataru Colours And Chemicals (Ita(L) 2887 Of 2009). In View Of The
High Court
29 Jun 2010 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Topman Exports v. Kalpataru Colours And Chemicals (Ita(L) 2887 Of 2009). In View Of The
Date of order
29 Jun 2010
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Topman Exports v. Kalpataru Colours And Chemicals (Ita(L) 2887 Of 2009). In View Of The, the High Court (2010) decided the matter.
Decision: In view of the statement made, the Appeal shall stand disposed of in the same terms.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
O. O. C. J.
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG.) NO.3019 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax- 14..Appellant.Vs.
Topman Exports..Respondent.
....
Mr. Vimal Gupta with Mr. Suresh Kumar, Mr. D.K. Kamwal, Mr. A.S. Shivsharan and Ms. Padma Divakar for the Appellant.
Mr.J.D.Mistry, Senior Advocate with Mr.A.D.Shetty, Mr. R.V.Shetty with Ms. Rita K. Joshi for the Respondent.
.....
CORAM : DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD & J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
P.C. :
29 June 2010.
Counsel appearing on behalf of the Revenue and counsel appearing on behalf of the assessee are agreed in stating that the questions of law which have been raised by the Revenue in this appeal under Section 260-A shall be governed by the judgment delivered today in Commissioner of Income Tax v. Kalpataru Colours and Chemicals (ITA(L) 2887 of 2009). In view of the
statement made, the Appeal shall stand disposed of in the same terms.
There shall be no order as to costs.
(Dr. D.Y.Chandrachud, J.)
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue