In Toyo Engineering India Limited v. The Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Range 10(3, the High Court (2012) decided the matter.
Issue: P.C. : DATE : 30[th] October 2012 1.Whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was justified in disallowing the depreciation on goodwill under Section 32(1)(ii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is the basic question raised in this appeal.
Decision: 3.The appeal is accordingly disposed of in above terms with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1330 OF 2012
Toyo Engineering India Limited..Appellant.Versus
The Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax, Range 10(3)
..Respondent.
Mr.Prakash Shah with Mr.Jas Sanghavi i/by PDS Legal for the appellant.Mr.Arvind Pinto for the respondent.
CORAM : J.P. Devadhar &M.S. Sanklecha, JJ.
P.C. :
DATE : 30[th] October 2012
1.Whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was justified in disallowing the depreciation on goodwill under Section 32(1)(ii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is the basic question raised in this appeal.
2.The Apex Court in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax V/s. Smifs Securities Limited reported in 348 ITR 302 (S.C.) has held that the depreciation would be allowable on goodwill. In this view of the matter, the impugned order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal is quashed and set aside and the matter is restored to the file of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal for fresh decision on merits and in accordance with law.
3.The appeal is accordingly disposed of in above terms with no order as to costs.
(M.S. Sanklecha, J.)
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.