Toyo Engineering India Ltd v. The Addl. Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
20 Feb 2013 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Toyo Engineering India Ltd v. The Addl. Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
20 Feb 2013
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Toyo Engineering India Ltd v. The Addl. Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2013) decided the matter.
Decision: 5)Accordingly, the appeals are disposed of in the above terms with no order as to costs.terms with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL LODG. NO.129 OF 2013
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL LODG. NO.128 OF 2013
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL LODG. NO.125 OF 2013
Toyo Engineering India Ltd. ..Appellant.
v.
The Addl. Commissioner of Income Tax. ..Respondent.
Mr. Prakash Shah with Mr. Jas Sanghavi i/by PDS Legal for the Appellant.Mr. Arvind Pinto for the Respondent.
CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND
M.S. SANKLECHA, JJ.
DATE : 20TH FEBRUARY, 2013
PC:
The appeals are not on board today. Mentioned. By
consent of the parties are taken on board for hearing.
2)In this appeal, following questions of law have been framed for our consideration.
a)Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case and in law the Appellate Tribunal is right in holding that the Appellant failed to prove the purchase of goodwill?
b)Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case and in law the Appellate Tribunal is right in disallowing the depreciation on goodwill under Section 32(1)(ii) of the Act?
3)Counsel for the parties state that the appellant assessee had filed an appeal being Income Tax Appeal (L) No.1330 of 2012 in this Court raising identical questions. By our order dated 30/10/2012 in Income Tax Appeal Lodging No.1330 of 2012, we set aside the order of the Tribunal and restored the matter to the file of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal for fresh decision on merits and in accordance with law. This was in view of the decision of the Apex Court in the matter of Commissioner of Income Tax v. Smifs Securities Limited reported in 348 ITR 302 (SC).had filed an appeal being Income Tax Appeal (L) No.1330 of 2012 in this Court raising identical questions. By our order dated 30/10/2012 in Income Tax Appeal Lodging No.1330 of 2012, we set aside the order of the Tribunal and restored the matter to the file of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal for fresh decision on merits and in accordance with law. This was in view of the decision of the Apex Court in the matter of Commissioner of Income Tax v. Smifs Securities Limited reported in 348 ITR 302 (SC).
4)For the aforesaid reasons, we set aside the impugned orders and restore the matters to the Tribunal for fresh decisions on merits. The Tribunal will decide the matters keeping in view the orders and restore the matters to the Tribunal for fresh decisions on merits. The Tribunal will decide the matters keeping in view the
decision of the Apex Court in the matter of Smifs Securities Limited (supra).Limited (supra).
5)Accordingly, the appeals are disposed of in the above terms with no order as to costs.terms with no order as to costs.
(M.S.SANKLECHA, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.