Case LawHigh Court › Triple M Educational Society (Regd v. Ch...

Triple M Educational Society (Regd v. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax, Ludhiana

High Court 19 May 2015 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Triple M Educational Society (Regd v. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax, Ludhiana
Date of order
19 May 2015
Assessment year(s)
2013-14
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Triple M Educational Society (Regd v. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax, Ludhiana, the High Court (2015) decided the matter.

Decision: The writ petition is accordingly disposed of.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.24499 of 2014 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION: 19.05.2015 Triple M Educational Society (Regd.) …..Petitioner versus Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, Ludhiana .....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. S.J. VAZIFDAR, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SANDHAWALIA Present: Mr. Ravi Shankar, Advocate for the petitioners Ms. Savita Saxena, Advocate for the respondent .. S.J. VAZIFDAR, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE: (Oral) Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners states that the petitioners have amended their memorandum of association and the lease agreement and that the petitioners, therefore, desire an opportunity of making a fresh application under Section 10(23C)(vi). 2. The impugned order rejecting the application was passed on 29.08.2014. The petitioners contend that subsequently they amended the memorandum of association and the lease agreement. According to them, in view of these amendments, they would be entitled to exemption for the assessment year 2013-14. 3. We make no observation regarding the merits of the petitioners’ contention. They are at liberty to make a fresh application under Section 10(23C) which will be decided in accordance with law. If, in view of the amendments, the petitioners are entitled to registration as claimed, the mere existence of the impugned order will not preclude the respondents from granting the same. 4. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. (S.J. VAZIFDAR) ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE 19.05.2015parkash* (G.S. SANDHAWALIA) JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan