Troika Estates Pvt.ltd v. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal & Ors
High Court
01 Feb 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Troika Estates Pvt.ltd v. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal & Ors
Date of order
01 Feb 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Troika Estates Pvt.ltd v. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal & Ors, the High Court (2018) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 5.In the above view, the Writ Petition is disposed of aswithdrawn, with the above liberty. [RIYAZ I.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sharayu Khot.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 2984 OF 2017
Troika Estates Pvt.Ltd.
…Petitioner
Versus
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal & Ors.
----------
…Respondents
Ms. Vasanti Patel, for the Petitioner.
Mr. P.C. Chhotaray, for the Respondents.
----------
CORAM :M.S. SANKLECHA &RIYAZ I. CHAGLA, JJ.
DATE : 1 February 2018
ORDER :
1.Heard Ms. Patel, learned Counsel appearing for the
Petitioner.
2.This Petition challenges the order dated 17 March2017 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal rejecting the
34-WP-2984-17.doc
Petitioner's Miscellaneous Application for rectification of theorder dated 3 February 2016 passed by the Tribunal.
3.Ms. Patel very fairly points out that the Petitionerhas filed an Appeal being the Income Tax Appeal No. 1652 of2016 from the order dated 3 February 2016 of the Tribunal. Inthe Appeal so filed, questions have been raised regarding themistakes in impugned order dated 3 February 2016. However,the Petition has been filed as the Respondents are threating toimplement the order dated 3 February 2016 of the Tribunal.
4.
In the above view, she is allowed to withdraw this
Petition with liberty to file Notice of Motion in the pendingIncome Tax Appeal No. 1652 of 2016 and seek appropriatereliefs therein.
5.In the above view, the Writ Petition is disposed of aswithdrawn, with the above liberty.
[RIYAZ I. CHAGLA J.]
[M.S. SANKLECHA, J.]
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.