In Tulsidas Khimji Pvt.ltd v. The Asstt.commissioner Of, the High Court (2008) allowed the appeal.
Decision: Appeal is allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 30 OF 2002
Tulsidas Khimji Pvt.Ltd. ..Appellant
vs.
The Asstt.Commissioner of
Income Tax Circle 1 and anr. ..Respondents
Ms.Devyani Wanigara i/b Mr.B.R.Oza for appellant.
Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for respondents.
CORAM: Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
CORAM: Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
CORAM: Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
S.J.KATHAWALLA JJ.
S.J.KATHAWALLA JJ.
S.J.KATHAWALLA JJ.
21stJuly 2008
21st
P.C.
P.C.
1. Heard learned Counsel for the appellant and the
learned Counsel for the respondents.
2. Learned Counsel appearing for the appellant seeks
leave to withdraw the appeal. Leave granted. Appeal is
allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such.
Permissible Court fee be refunded to the appellant as per
rules.
(S.J
(S.J.KATHAWALLA J.) (Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN J.)
KATHAWALLA J.) (Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue