Tuticorin 628 005 v. The Income Tax Inspector, Ward-I(1), Tuticorin
High Court
14 Oct 2015 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Tuticorin 628 005 v. The Income Tax Inspector, Ward-I(1), Tuticorin
Date of order
14 Oct 2015
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Tuticorin 628 005 v. The Income Tax Inspector, Ward-I(1), Tuticorin, the High Court (2015) decided the matter.
Decision: Recording the above said submission of the learned counselfor the department that the department would withdraw the garnisheeorder issued against the petitioner this writ petition is disposed of.No costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R. MAHADEVAN
W.P.No.4574 of 2003
Pandian Associates,A Partnership Firm,
Rep. by its Managing PartnerC.S.Shenbagamara Pandian,5/91-7, SPIC Ancillary Industrial Estate,SPIC Nagar,
TUTICORIN 628 005.
-Versus-
... Petitioner
1. The Income Tax Inspector, Ward-I(1), Tuticorin.
2. The Income Tax Inspector, Office of the Income Tax Officer, Ward I(1), Tuticorin.
3. Act India Limited, 4/162, Harbour Construction Road, Tuticorin.
4. Southern Petro-Chemical Industries Corpn Limited, SPIC Nagar, Tuticorin 628 007.
...Respondents
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution ofIndia for the relief of issuance of Writ of Certiorari calling for therecords of the 1st respondent in his proceedings No.1310-C/Arrearsdated 12.11.2002 and G.1 No.C-1310/1(1)/TTN dated 13.11.2002 and toquash the above said proceedings insofar as it relates to attachment ofmonies receivable by the petitioner viz., Pandian Associates fromrespondents 3 and 4.
For Petitioner
For Respondent(s)
:Mr.T.Pon Ram Kumar:Mr.T.Pramodkumar Chopda
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
The learned counsel appearing for the department submits thatthe garnishee order would be withdrawn by the department itself asthere is no ground to make such an order against the petitioner.
2. Recording the above said submission of the learned counselfor the department that the department would withdraw the garnisheeorder issued against the petitioner this writ petition is disposed of.No costs. Kmk
Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CS-II)/True Copy/ Sub-Assistant Registrar To1. The Income Tax Inspector, Ward-I(1), Tuticorin.2. The Income Tax Inspector, Office of the Income Tax Officer, Ward I(1), Tuticorin.+1 C.C. To MRS.A.L.Gandhimathi, Advocate in SR.NO.56533+1 C.C. To MR.T.Pramodkumar Chopda, Advocate in SR.NO.56751W.P.No.4574 of 2003 KJI(CO)sd : 30/10/2015
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.