Tvh Energy Resources Private Limited,Rep. By Its Director v. The Income Tax Department
High Court
02 Jan 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Tvh Energy Resources Private Limited,Rep. By Its Director v. The Income Tax Department
Date of order
02 Jan 2018
Assessment year(s)
2011-2012, 2013-2014
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Tvh Energy Resources Private Limited,Rep. By Its Director v. The Income Tax Department, the High Court (2018) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 02.01.2018
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM
W.P.No.28817 of 2017and W.M.P.Nos.31012 and 31013 of 2017
TVH Energy Resources Private Limited,Rep. by its Director,No.16/17, 3rd Cross Street,TVH Novella, R.A.Puram,Chennai - 600 028.
.. Petitioner Vs.
1.The Income Tax Department, Represented by its Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle I(2), No.46, Uthamar Gandhi Salai, Nungambakkam, Chennai - 600 034.
2.The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)XVIII, Income Tax Department, No.46, Uthamar Gandhi Salai, Nungambakkam, Chennai - 600 034.
3.The Principal Commissioner of Income TX,
Central - I, No.46, Uthamar Gandhi Salai, Nungambakkam, Chennai - 600 034.
.. Respondents
Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records of the first respondent pertaining to the impugned attachment orders in PAN/GIR No. dated 09.10.2017 and 06.11.2017 and quash the same.
For Petitioner
For Respondent
: Mr.Richardson Wilson
: Mr.A.P.Srinivas Senior Standing Counsel Senior Standing Counsel
ORDER
Heard Richardson Wilson, the learned counsel appearing for the
petitioner and Mr.A.P.Srinivas, the learned Senior Standing Counsel for the Revenue.
2. The petitioner has filed this Writ Petition, challenging the attachment
orders passed by the first respondent, dated 09.10.2017 and 06.11.2017, which orders are consequence of the order passed by the Assessing Officer, dated 30.03.2016, as confirmed by the Appellate Authority, in orders, dated 08.08.2017 and 22.08.2017.
3.The petitioner has filed this Writ Petition, contending that, when the
Appeal as against the said order is pending before the Income Tax Appellate
Tribunal (ITAT), the impugned notices should not be given effect to. When this case was heard on 13.11.2017, it was pointed out that ITAT has dismissed the petitioner's Stay Petition, by order, dated 03.11.2017, and the learned counsel for the petitioner wanted time to get instructions from his client and his client should be granted reasonable time to question the correctness of the order, dismissing the Stay Petition, or in the alternative, to argue the main
http://www.judis.nic.in
Appeals before the ITAT. The ITAT has heard one of the appeals pertaining to
the assessment year 2011-2012 and by order dated 30.03.2016 has allowed the
appeal, set aside the order passed by the Assessing Officer and the First Appellate Authority and remanded back the matter to the file of the Assessing
Officer with certain pointed directions. It appears that in respect of other appeal for the assessment year 2013-2014, it is still pending and it is submitted
by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the said appeal is to be allowed in the light of the order passed by the Tribunal for the assessment year 2011-2012. So far as the impugned orders are concerned, which are orders of attachment of the petitioner's bank account, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the Department themselves have lifted the attachment.
4.In the light of the above, no further orders are required except
recording the statement made by the learned counsel appearing for the
petitioner. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of. No costs.
Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
02.01.2018
cse
Index:Yes/No
Internet:Yes/No
Speaking Order/Non-Speaking Orderhttp://www.judis.nic.in
To
1.The Income Tax Department, Represented by its Represented by its
Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle I(2), No.46, Uthamar Gandhi Salai, Central Circle I(2), No.46, Uthamar Gandhi Salai,
Nungambakkam, Chennai - 600 034.
4.In the light of the above, no further orders are required except
recording the statement made by the learned counsel appearing for the
petitioner. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of. No costs.
Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
02.01.2018
cse
Index:Yes/No
Internet:Yes/No
Speaking Order/Non-Speaking Orderhttp://www.judis.nic.in
To
1.The Income Tax Department, Represented by its Represented by its
Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle I(2), No.46, Uthamar Gandhi Salai, Central Circle I(2), No.46, Uthamar Gandhi Salai,
Nungambakkam, Chennai - 600 034.
2.The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)XVIII, Income Tax Department, No.46, Uthamar Gandhi Salai, Nungambakkam, Chennai - 600 034. Income Tax Department, No.46, Uthamar Gandhi Salai, Nungambakkam, Chennai - 600 034.
3.The Principal Commissioner of Income TX,
Central - I, No.46, Uthamar Gandhi Salai, Nungambakkam, Chennai - 600 034.
T.S.SIVAGNANAM, J.cse
W.P.No.28817 of 2017and W.M.P.Nos.31012 and 31013 of 201702.01.2018
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.