Case Law › High Court › Txa/16/2011 Of Mr. Savio Proenca v. Comm...

Txa/16/2011 Of Mr. Savio Proenca v. Commissioner Of Income Tax And Anr

High Court 16 Oct 2012 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · hcbgoa

Parties

Date of order

16 Oct 2012

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

Case summary

In Txa/16/2011 Of Mr. Savio Proenca v. Commissioner Of Income Tax And Anr, the High Court (2012) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOAMISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 950/2012STAMP NUMBER (APPLN) NO.2642 OF 2012AND TAX APPEAL NO.16 OF 2011. MR. SAVIO PROENCA. ...….. APPLICANT/ APPELLANT. V/S. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXAND ANOTHER. ...….. RESPONDENTS. Mr. P. Rao, Advocate for the applicant/appellant. Ms. Asha Dessai, Advocate for the respondents. CORAM :- A.P. LAVANDE & U.V. BAKRE, JJ. DATE : - 16/10/2012 P.C.:- The applicant in Misc. Civil Application No.950/2012 seeks condonation of delay in filing the application for restoration of Tax Appeal No.16/2011. By Stamp Number (Appln.) No.2642 of 2012, the applicant seeks restoration of Tax Appeal No.16/2011. 2. In view of the above, the delay in filing the application is condoned and Tax Appeal no.16/2011 is restored. 3.Mr. Rao appearing for the applicant/appellant submits that he wants to withdraw Tax Appeal No.16/2011. Leave granted. Tax Appeal No. 16/2011 is disposed of as withdrawn. A.P. LAVANDE, J. U.V. BAKRE, J. ssm.

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.