Txa/43/2017 Of The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Panaji v. D.m. Minerals And Resources
High Court
16 Sep 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hcbgoa
Parties
Txa/43/2017 Of The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Panaji v. D.m. Minerals And Resources
Date of order
16 Sep 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Txa/43/2017 Of The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Panaji v. D.m. Minerals And Resources, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
TAX APPEAL NOS. 43/2017, 66/2018 & 10/2019
TAX APPEAL NO. 43/2017
The Principal Commissioner
of Income Tax, Panaji.
.... Appellant
V/s.
D.M. Minerals & Resources
.... Respondent
Ms. Amira Razaq, Standing Counsel for the Appellant.Shri Gaurang Panandiker with Ms. Esha Dukle, Advocate for theRespondent.
WITH
TAX APPEAL NO.66/2018 & 10/2019
The Principal Commissioner
of Income Tax, Panaji.
.... Appellant
V/s.
The Kadamba Employees
Co-op. Society Ltd.
.... Respondent
Ms. Susan Linhares, Standing Counsel for the Appellant.Shri S.R. Rivankar with Shri Rama G. Rivankar, Advocate for theRespondent.
Coram:- M.S. SONAK &
NUTAN D. SARDESSAI, JJ.
Date :- 16th September, 2019
ORAL ORDER : (Per M.S. Sonak, J.)
Ms. Susan Linhares, the learned Standing Counsel for
the Department, on the basis of instructions from the Departmentin terms of the CBDT Circular dated 08/08/2019 and 20/08/2019,
seeks leave to withdraw the above appeals.
2.Accordingly, we grant leave and dispose of the aboveappeals as withdrawn.
NUTAN D. SARDESSAI, J.
M.S. SONAK, J.
NH
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue