U.ahamed Meeran v. The Assistant Commissioner (C.t
High Court
11 Aug 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
U.ahamed Meeran v. The Assistant Commissioner (C.t
Date of order
11 Aug 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In U.ahamed Meeran v. The Assistant Commissioner (C.t, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.
Decision: 5.This writ petition is dismissed, with liberty as above.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
W.P.No.6642 of 2019 &WMP.Nos.7464 & 7467 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated: 30.09.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH
W.P.No.6642 of 2019 &
WMP.Nos.7464 & 7467 of 2019
U.Ahamed Meeran
Vs
... Petitioner
The Assistant Commissioner (C.T.),
Commercial Taxes Department,Madhavaram Assessment Circle,
Chennai – 600 066.... Respondent
Prayer:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records in respect of the attachment order dated 22.02.2019 issued in Form U by the respondent and communicated to Bank of India, Overseas Branch, Chennai 600 001 vide letter No.TNVAT 33731086381/2018-19/A3 dated 22.02.2019 and quash the same and direct the respondent to furnish the assessment order concerned with the issue of the aforesaid attachment order to enable the petitioner to challenge the same or to direct the respondent to re-adjudicate after giving adequate opportunity to the petitioner.
For Petitioner : Mr.A.K.Jayaraj
W.P.No.6642 of 2019 &WMP.Nos.7464 & 7467 of 2019
For Respondent: Mr.V.Prashanth Kiran, Additional Government Pleader
O R D E R
An affidavit is filed by the petitioner dated 27.09.2022 wherein the petitioner undertakes to remit 10% of the disputed tax upon remittance of which he prays that he be permitted to avail statutory appellate remedy.
2.Mr.V.Prashanth Kiran, learned Additional Government Pleader has no objection to the request made. Hence, the offer of the petitioner to remit 10% of the disputed tax within four weeks from today is acceded to. Petitioner is permitted to file an appeal as against the impugned order within two weeks from date of payment of amount as aforesaid.
3. Since, it is the petitioner's case that he has not received the assessment order, though disputed in counter, learned Government Pleader has supplied a copy of the order to Mr.Jayaraj for onward transmission to the petitioner. The order as aforesaid may accompany the appeal to be filed.
W.P.No.6642 of 2019 &WMP.Nos.7464 & 7467 of 2019
4. Appeal, if filed within the period as aforesaid shall be received by the
first Appellate Authority without reference to limitation but ensuring strict compliance of
(i) remittance of 10% as offered by the petitioner.
(ii) statutory pre-deposit of 25% of the disputed tax over and above the
10% as above,
and be disposed in accordance with law.
5.This writ petition is dismissed, with liberty as above. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.
kbs
Index : Yes / NoSpeaking Order / Non Speaking Order
29.09.2022
To
The Assistant Commissioner (C.T.),Commercial Taxes Department,Madhavaram Assessment Circle,Chennai – 600 066.
W.P.No.6642 of 2019 &WMP.Nos.7464 & 7467 of 2019
DR.ANITA SUMANTH, J.
kbs
W.P.No.6642 of 2019 &WMP.Nos.7464 & 7467 of 2019
29.09.2022
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.