In Uhde India Ltd v. The Assistant Commissionerof Income Tax, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.
Decision: Byconsent of the parties, our parties, our earlier order 26/03/2007 stands recalled and the Petition stands restored to file.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.177 OF 2007
IN
WRIT PETITION NO.3017 OF 2006
Uhde India Ltd.
..Petitioner
Vs.
The Assistant commissionerof Income Tax
..Respondent
Mr.Firoze B.Andhyarujina, Senior Advocate withPallavi Divekar for the Petitioner.Mr.Vimal Gupta for the Respondent.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &V.C.DAGA, JJ.DATE : 30TH APRIL, 2007
P.C.
1.Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. Byconsent of the parties, our
parties, our earlier order
26/03/2007 stands recalled and the Petition stands
restored to file.
2.Place the above Petition on board on
11/06/2007.
(V.C.DAGA,J.)
(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
dated
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue