Uma Chauhan v. Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
15 Sep 2023 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · cmis
Parties
Uma Chauhan v. Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
15 Sep 2023
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Uma Chauhan v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2023) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Issue: Whether approved for reporting?[1]For the appellant(s) : Mr.
Decision: 3 and 4 of 2012 have been allowed vide a separate order today, these appeals are also allowed and the penalties imposed for the said assessment years are also set aside.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
ITA No. 01 of 2012
ITA No. 01 of 2012 a/w
ITA No. 02 of 2012
Decided on : 15.09.2023
Uma Chauhan, Proprietor of M/s Heena Knitwears
…....Appellant.
Versus
Commissioner of Income Tax
ITA No. 02 of 2012
…….. Respondent.
Uma Chauhan, Proprietor of M/s Heena Knitwears
…....Appellant.
Versus
Commissioner of Income Tax
…….. Respondent.
Coram
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice M.S. Ramachandra Rao, Chief Justice.
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?[1]For the appellant(s) : Mr. Vishal Mohan, Senior Advocate with M/s Praveen Sharma and Rajeev Kumar, Advocates. For the respondent(s) : M/s Vandana Kuthiala and Diwan Singh Negi, Advocates.
M.S. Ramachandra Rao, Chief Justice(Oral)
Having regard to the fact that ITAs No. 3 and 4 of 2012
have been allowed vide a separate order today, these appeals are also
allowed and the penalties imposed for the said assessment years are
also set aside. Pending miscellaneous application(s), also stand disposed of accordingly. No costs.
(M.S. Ramachandra Rao) Chief Justice
September 15, 2023 (narender)
(Ajay Mohan Goel)Judge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.