Uma Dutt Paliwal v. Commissioner Of Income Tax,Karnal
High Court
20 Jul 2011 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Uma Dutt Paliwal v. Commissioner Of Income Tax,Karnal
Date of order
20 Jul 2011
Assessment year(s)
2005-06
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Uma Dutt Paliwal v. Commissioner Of Income Tax,Karnal, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: In view of the above, the appeal is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
---
Income Tax Appeal No. 173 of 2011Date of decision: 20.7.2011
Uma Dutt Paliwal Prop. Paliwal Home Furnishers, Gohana, Panipat
Versus
…. Appellant
Commissioner of Income Tax,Karnal
….. Respondent
CORAM:HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOELACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL
---
Present:Mr. Rishab Kapoor, Advocatefor the appellant.
---
AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J.
This appeal under Section 260A of the Income-Tax Act,1961 (for short “the Act”) has been filed by the assessee against theorder dated 30.7.2010, passed by the Income Tax Appellate TribunalDelhi Bench ‘H’, New Delhi (in short “the Tribunal”) in ITA No.3271/Del/2008, relating to the assessment year 2005-06.
The following substantial questions of law have been
claimed for determination of this Court:
“ (i)Whether on the true and correct interpretation of theprovisions of section 145 the findings are sustainable forcharging the income from undisclosed sources underprovisions of section 145 the findings are sustainable forcharging the income from undisclosed sources under
Chapter VI without discharging the departmental onus to
prove the source of such other income?
(ii)Whether the Tribunal’s order is sustainable, for theadditions made to the income of the assessee as incomefrom other undisclosed sources can be considered asincome from the business, which is eligible for deductionu/s 80-IB of the Income Tax Act, 1961?”additions made to the income of the assessee as incomefrom other undisclosed sources can be considered asincome from the business, which is eligible for deductionu/s 80-IB of the Income Tax Act, 1961?”
Learned counsel for the appellant fairly states that the aforesaid
issues are covered by the decision of this Court in Income TaxAppeal No. 195 of 2011 (Vallabh Yarns Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner ofIncome Tax) decided on 14.7.2011. In the said case, the appealpreferred by the assessee had been dismissed.
In view of the above, the appeal is dismissed.
(AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE
July 20, 2011*rkmalik*
(ADARSH KUMAR GOEL) ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.