Union Bank Of India, Mumbai v. The Commissioner Of Income Taxappeals-Ii, Mumbai
High Court
25 Sep 2012 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Union Bank Of India, Mumbai v. The Commissioner Of Income Taxappeals-Ii, Mumbai
Date of order
25 Sep 2012
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Union Bank Of India, Mumbai v. The Commissioner Of Income Taxappeals-Ii, Mumbai, the High Court (2012) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1654 OF 2012
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.824 OF 2012
Union Bank of India, Mumbai.
Vs.
The Commissioner of Income TaxAppeals-II, Mumbai.
...Appellant.
...Respondent.
Mr. P.P.Tipnis i/by M/s. Consulta Juris for the Appellant.Mr. Suresh Kumar for the Respondent.
CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR &
M.S. SANKLECHA, JJ.
DATE : 25TH SEPTEMBER, 2012.
PC:
This Notice of Motion is taken out by the appellant
seeking condonation of delay of 412 days. For the reasons stated in
the affidavit in support of the notice of motion, delay is condoned and the notice of motion is made absolute in terms of the prayer clause (a).
( M.S. SANKLECHA, J. )
( J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue