Case LawHigh Court › Union Of India v. Raghuveer Prasad Meena

Union Of India v. Raghuveer Prasad Meena

High Court 20 Sep 2017 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
Union Of India v. Raghuveer Prasad Meena
Date of order
20 Sep 2017
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Union Of India v. Raghuveer Prasad Meena, the High Court (2017) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH ATJAIPUR D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14297 / 2017 1. Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, Department of Income Tax, Central Revenue Building, Statue Circle, Jaipur. 2. Union of India Through Its Secretary, Ministry of Finance,Department of Revenue, New Delhi. ----PetitionersVersus Raghuveer Prasad Meena, S/o Late Shri Kanhaiya Lal Meena, AgedAbout 57 Years, R/o 3/405, Swami Vivekanand Nagar, Kota (Raj.).Presently Working As Income Tax Officer (Head Quarter), IncomeTax Department, Kota (Raj.). ----Respondent _____________________________________________________ For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anuroop SinghiFor Respondent(s) : _____________________________________________________ HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH CHANDRA SOMANIOrder 20/09/2017 1.The writ petition was necessitated on account of non-functioning of the Bench of the Central Administrative Tribunal inJaipur. Learned counsel states that the Bench would be sitting inJaipur in the First week of October, 2017. 2.We dispose of the petition directing that the application filed by the writ-petitioner for vacation of the ex parte order ofstay in favour of the respondent shall be taken up by the Bench ofthe Tribunal on the second day of its sitting in the month ofOctober, 2017. (DINESH CHANDRA SOMANI)J. (PRADEEP NANDRAJOG)C.J. JKP/S-21
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan