Union Of India v. Rajendra Kumar Verma
High Court
18 Sep 2017 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
Union Of India v. Rajendra Kumar Verma
Date of order
18 Sep 2017
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Union Of India v. Rajendra Kumar Verma, the High Court (2017) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH ATJAIPUR
D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14278 / 2017
1. Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, Department ofIncome Tax, New Central Revenue Building, Statue Circle, Jaipur.
2. Union of India Through Its Secretary, Ministry of Finance,Department of Revenue, New Delhi.
----Petitioners
Versus
1. Rajendra Kumar Verma S/o Shri R.S. Verma, Aged About 45Years, R/o 69, Vikas Nagar, Murlipura, Jaipur. Presently Working AsInspector in the Department of Income Tax, Jaipur.
2. Sunil Kumar Mathur, Commissioner of Income Tax, NCRBuilding, Statue Circle, Jaipur (Raj.)
----Respondents
_____________________________________________________
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anuroop Singhi.
_____________________________________________________
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH CHANDRA SOMANIOrder
18/09/2017
(1)The writ petition was necessitated on account of non-functioning of the Bench of the Central Administrative Tribunal inJaipur. Learned Counsel states that the Bench would be sitting inJaipur in the First week of October, 2017.
(2)We dispose of the petition directing that the applicationfiled by the writ-petitioner for vacation of the ex parte order ofstay in favour of the respondent shall be taken up by the Bench ofthe Tribunal on the second day of its sitting in the month ofOctober, 2017.
(DINESH CHANDRA SOMANI),J. (PRADEEP NANDRAJOG),C.J.
N.Gandhi/38
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.