Case Law › High Court › Union Of India v. Shri K.c. Goel, Assist...

Union Of India v. Shri K.c. Goel, Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax (Retd

High Court 11 Jul 2013 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · testcase

Parties

Date of order

11 Jul 2013

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Union Of India v. Shri K.c. Goel, Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax (Retd, the High Court (2013) allowed the appeal.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYNAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION W. NO.3112/2012IN WRIT PETITION NO.2489/2007 Union of India, through the Secretary, Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance,North Block, New Delhi ...Versus... Shri K.C. Goel, Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (Retd.) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's ordersappearances, Court's orders of directionsand Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri Darda, Adv. for petitioner/applicant CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA AND Z.A. HAQ, JJ.DATE: 11.07.2013 Application for condonation of delay in bringing legal representatives of respondent on record and for condonation of delay in filing application for setting aside abatement, filed by the petitioner, is allowed as sufficient cause and reason are made out. Civil Application stands disposed of. JUDGE JUDGE

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.