In Union Of India v. Jatin @ Rajesh Khanna & Anr, the High Court (2013) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
APEAL.480.01
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYAPPELLATE SIDE
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 480 OF 2001
UNION OF INDIA.. APPLICANT
VERSUS
JATIN @ RAJESH KHANNA & ANR..RESPONDENTS
Mr. D. A. Nalawade, Advocate for the applicant Smt. V. R. Bhonsale, APP for the State
CORAM:-ABHAY M. THIPSAY, J.DATED : 29/01/2013
P.C.
Called out of turn on being mentioned by Mr. D. A.
Nalawade, learned Public Prosecutor for the Union of Indian.
2.Respondent No. 1 is reported to be dead.
3.Appeal abates.
md.saleem
(ABHAY M. THIPSAY, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.